Six-year single term will curb electoral malpractices says Atiku

Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has expressed displeasure with the speed with which the six-year single term proposal for president and governors was rejected by the House of Representatives.

Abubakar expressed the displeasure in a statement issued by his Media Adviser, Mr. Paul Ibe, on Tuesday in Abuja, while reacting to the rejection of the bill by the House on Monday.

Read also: Lawmakers wrestle over Bill seeking 6 years single term for Presidents, Governors  

He said he was disappointed by the fact that the lawmakers had thrown away the baby with the bath water at the expense of the larger interest of the country.

Abubakar said that in view of the challenges facing Nigeria’s current democratic order, especially the culture of rigging that subverts the will of the people, six-year single term would have ended such untoward practices in its electoral process.

Abubakar regretted that eight-year term of office rewards incompetence because even incumbents that have failed would use their access to public funds to return to power by fair or foul means.

According to him, it is not how long a man spends in office, but how well he is adequately prepared for the job.



He argued that the desperation for second term was not necessarily driven by patriotism or the passion for service, but by the obsession with the greed for power for its own sake.

The former vice president said that the rejection of the six-year single term was a mistake because little attention was paid to its merits.

Abubakar said that eight years tenure of four years each sacrificed merit because the incumbents were automatically entitled to re-election regardless of their performance records.

Read also: Netflix loses Christian users because of "Gay Jesus" movie  

He was, however, of the view that current holders of the offices under the proposed constitutional review should not be entitled to a six-year term at the expiration of their second term. (NAN)